Ludka, nemozem najst presne tie clanky, ktore som citala, ked som sa o MMR-ke rozhodovala, ale vygooglila som teraz toto:
http://briandeer.com/mmr/lancet-summary.htmIslo o tak krasny ucebnicovy priklad pseudovedeckeho pseudovyskumu, ze to bolo uz x-krat spracovane do vselijakych zhrnuti. Kopirujem sem relevantny odstavec, lebo je to dost dlhy clanok:
"And, if this was not enough to cast doubt on the research's objectivity, The Sunday Times investigation unearthed another shocking conflict of interest. In June 1997 - nearly nine months before the press conference at which Wakefield called for single vaccines - he had filed a patent on products, including his own supposedly "safer" single measles vaccine, which only stood any prospect of success if confidence in MMR was damaged. Although Wakefield denied any such plans, his proposed shot, and a network of companies intended to raise venture capital for purported inventions - including a vaccine, testing methods, and strange potential miracle cures for autism - were set out in confidential documents."
Urcite cely clanok stoji za precitanie, su tam aj odhady, kolko Wakefield na svojom "vyskume" zarobil. Iny prehlad studii, ktore sa snazili potvrdit suvis medzi MMR a autizmom, a vlastne chronologicky prehlad celeho pripadu je napriklad aj tu:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/1808956.stmEsterka, ja verim, ze pan Fillo na svojej praci nezaraba, ze to robi naozaj z dobrej vole a presvedcenia, ale robi uzasnu reklamu napriklad spominanemu Wakefieldovi, ktoreho ma stale za hrdinu a dokona martyra:
http://www.slobodavockovani.sk/news/nov ... efieldovi/Jeho clanky sa mi zdaju byt nabite viac emociami nez serioznymi faktami, nemam dojem, ze by usilovne patral po objektivnych faktoch, ale skor ze usilovne patra po faktoch podporujucich jeho presvedcenie, a zosilnuje ich tym emocianlym nabojom. Podobne na mna posobila slavna prednaska slavnej Anity Petek, uviedla zopar ucrite povsimnutiahodnych faktov, no cele to obalila do tak hrubej vrstvy emocii, este to aj cele znemoznila vlastnymi zufalymi teoriami o chorobach, ze... tazko sa mi to pise, ale je to tak... mi to silne pripomina nabozensky fanatizmus.
Aby bolo jasne, neobhajujem ockovanie, sama som u Misky niektore povinne ockovania odmietla, akurat sa snazim vysvetlit, preco mi je tak tazke hltat vsetky tie "info" od antivakcinacnej kampane.